<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is &#34;Peer Pressure&#34; The Business Case for Social Media in Communications?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accidentallyonpurposeblog.com/2007/04/09/is-peer-pressure-the-business-case-for-social-media-in-communications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accidentallyonpurposeblog.com/2007/04/09/is-peer-pressure-the-business-case-for-social-media-in-communications/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: introspectiveH &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Challenges of Emergent Collaboration</title>
		<link>http://www.accidentallyonpurposeblog.com/2007/04/09/is-peer-pressure-the-business-case-for-social-media-in-communications/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>introspectiveH &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Challenges of Emergent Collaboration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversal.com/0_mikep/?p=10#comment-100</guid>
		<description>[...] a recent response from Mike Prosceno of SAP, he answers a couple of questions regarding his post about Enterprise 2.0 and The Dawn of Emergent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a recent response from Mike Prosceno of SAP, he answers a couple of questions regarding his post about Enterprise 2.0 and The Dawn of Emergent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piyawan</title>
		<link>http://www.accidentallyonpurposeblog.com/2007/04/09/is-peer-pressure-the-business-case-for-social-media-in-communications/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>piyawan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversal.com/0_mikep/?p=10#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Great blog!

I like the office view!

If you have time, please submit the view to my new blog: www.viewfromoffice.com and in return I’ll include a link to your blog!

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Great blog!</p>
<p>I like the office view!</p>
<p>If you have time, please submit the view to my new blog: <a href="http://www.viewfromoffice.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.viewfromoffice.com</a> and in return I’ll include a link to your blog!</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ewH</title>
		<link>http://www.accidentallyonpurposeblog.com/2007/04/09/is-peer-pressure-the-business-case-for-social-media-in-communications/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>ewH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversal.com/0_mikep/?p=10#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,
I agree that companies need to hop on the social media bandwagon or fall in danger of being left behind.  The problem is that companies with old school views of the world cannot deal with the two questions:

1) How do we measure the benefits of social media in a way where we can put concrete numbers against it? In a world of management by objectives, people like to be safe and put conservative, measurable results on everything.  The problem is that you can't put on your objectives to "create 25 meaningful relationships and increase  quality knowledge by 25% by Q3."   The qualities that emergent collaboration foster are not easily measured.

2)  How do we put incentives on participation?  Again, traditional views cannot understand that things like meaningful relationships, quality information, and volunteer participation are not only the means, but they are the ends as well.  When everything is about lowering costs and increasing savings, it's hard to see a world where social content is king.

Thanks for the nice post!
-ewH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,<br />
I agree that companies need to hop on the social media bandwagon or fall in danger of being left behind.  The problem is that companies with old school views of the world cannot deal with the two questions:</p>
<p>1) How do we measure the benefits of social media in a way where we can put concrete numbers against it? In a world of management by objectives, people like to be safe and put conservative, measurable results on everything.  The problem is that you can&#8217;t put on your objectives to &#8220;create 25 meaningful relationships and increase  quality knowledge by 25% by Q3.&#8221;   The qualities that emergent collaboration foster are not easily measured.</p>
<p>2)  How do we put incentives on participation?  Again, traditional views cannot understand that things like meaningful relationships, quality information, and volunteer participation are not only the means, but they are the ends as well.  When everything is about lowering costs and increasing savings, it&#8217;s hard to see a world where social content is king.</p>
<p>Thanks for the nice post!<br />
-ewH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
