<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Belated Response To Ed Herrmann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accidentallyonpurposeblog.com/2007/04/14/a-belated-response-to-ed-herrmann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accidentallyonpurposeblog.com/2007/04/14/a-belated-response-to-ed-herrmann/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accidentallyonpurposeblog.com/2007/04/14/a-belated-response-to-ed-herrmann/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversal.com/0_mikep/?p=11#comment-131</guid>
		<description>If the job is done well enough, people like me will be rendered irrelevant - sounds like a good strategy to me -:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the job is done well enough, people like me will be rendered irrelevant - sounds like a good strategy to me -:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.accidentallyonpurposeblog.com/2007/04/14/a-belated-response-to-ed-herrmann/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversal.com/0_mikep/?p=11#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Dennis, I hear you.  My comment was a bit tounge in cheek in that you and I have discussed the issue at some length - I suspect that conversation will continue.  It is a long row to hoe but I will do my part and hopefully inspire others to make the very change your advocating.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, I hear you.  My comment was a bit tounge in cheek in that you and I have discussed the issue at some length - I suspect that conversation will continue.  It is a long row to hoe but I will do my part and hopefully inspire others to make the very change your advocating.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: introspectiveH &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Challenges of Emergent Collaboration</title>
		<link>http://www.accidentallyonpurposeblog.com/2007/04/14/a-belated-response-to-ed-herrmann/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>introspectiveH &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Challenges of Emergent Collaboration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversal.com/0_mikep/?p=11#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] a recent response from Mike Prosceno of SAP, he answers a couple of questions regarding his post about Enterprise 2.0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a recent response from Mike Prosceno of SAP, he answers a couple of questions regarding his post about Enterprise 2.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accidentallyonpurposeblog.com/2007/04/14/a-belated-response-to-ed-herrmann/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversal.com/0_mikep/?p=11#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Mike - as with all things, history teaches me certain things. So while I amhard on PR, it's not ALL PR, ALL the time. That would be myopic, irrational and prejudiced. If SAP (PR included) can challenge my 'history' and turn that around then on any objective measure - the job's been done. That's precisely why I set that challenge. I see it as a direct contrast to  the tree slaughtering and otherwise pointless exercise in creating the SAP story books which used to do the rounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike - as with all things, history teaches me certain things. So while I amhard on PR, it&#8217;s not ALL PR, ALL the time. That would be myopic, irrational and prejudiced. If SAP (PR included) can challenge my &#8216;history&#8217; and turn that around then on any objective measure - the job&#8217;s been done. That&#8217;s precisely why I set that challenge. I see it as a direct contrast to  the tree slaughtering and otherwise pointless exercise in creating the SAP story books which used to do the rounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; links for 2007-04-17</title>
		<link>http://www.accidentallyonpurposeblog.com/2007/04/14/a-belated-response-to-ed-herrmann/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; links for 2007-04-17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversal.com/0_mikep/?p=11#comment-127</guid>
		<description>[...] Accidentally on Purpose » Blog Archive » A Belated Response To Ed Herrmann on SAP and innovation (tags: SAP) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Accidentally on Purpose » Blog Archive » A Belated Response To Ed Herrmann on SAP and innovation (tags: SAP) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
